Business Insurance Cost Comparison: 17-State Analysis
Understanding how business insurance costs vary across states is crucial for companies considering expansion, relocation, or simply benchmarking their current costs. This comprehensive analysis compares insurance costs across 17 major U.S. business markets, examining workers’ compensation rates, key cost drivers, and regional patterns.
States Covered in This Analysis
| Region | States |
|---|---|
| Northeast | New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts |
| Southeast | Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia |
| Midwest | Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, Minnesota |
| West | California, Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Washington |
Executive Summary: Cost Rankings
Overall Business Insurance Cost Index
Based on combined workers’ compensation, commercial auto, and general liability costs:
| Rank | State | Cost Index | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | 148 | Highest Cost |
| 2 | New York | 142 | Highest Cost |
| 3 | New Jersey | 135 | High Cost |
| 4 | Illinois | 128 | High Cost |
| 5 | Massachusetts | 125 | High Cost |
| 6 | Florida | 118 | Above Average |
| 7 | Washington | 115 | Above Average |
| 8 | Michigan | 112 | Above Average |
| 9 | Pennsylvania | 108 | Average |
| 10 | Colorado | 105 | Average |
| 11 | Minnesota | 102 | Average |
| 12 | Ohio | 98 | Below Average |
| 13 | Arizona | 95 | Below Average |
| 14 | Georgia | 92 | Below Average |
| 15 | Texas | 88 | Low Cost |
| 16 | Virginia | 85 | Low Cost |
| 17 | North Carolina | 82 | Lowest Cost |
Index based on 100 = national average. Actual costs vary significantly by industry and company-specific factors.
Workers’ Compensation Cost Comparison
Workers’ compensation is often the largest insurance expense for businesses with employees. Costs vary dramatically by state due to regulatory structure, benefit levels, and market competition.
Workers’ Comp Rate Comparison by State
Office/Clerical Operations (Low Risk)
| State | Rate per $100 Payroll | Annual Cost per Employee* | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | $0.15 - $0.30 | $75 - $150 | Rate Bureau system |
| Virginia | $0.20 - $0.45 | $100 - $225 | Competitive market |
| Texas | $0.18 - $0.40 | $90 - $200 | Optional coverage |
| Georgia | $0.20 - $0.40 | $100 - $200 | Business-friendly |
| Arizona | $0.15 - $0.40 | $75 - $200 | Competitive market |
| Ohio | $0.25 - $0.50 | $125 - $250 | BWC monopolistic |
| Minnesota | $0.20 - $0.45 | $100 - $225 | Competitive market |
| Colorado | $0.15 - $0.40 | $75 - $200 | Pinnacol option |
| Pennsylvania | $0.25 - $0.55 | $125 - $275 | Competitive market |
| Michigan | $0.20 - $0.50 | $100 - $250 | Competitive market |
| Florida | $0.25 - $0.50 | $125 - $250 | Competitive market |
| Washington | $0.08 - $0.20 | $40 - $100 | L&I monopolistic |
| Illinois | $0.30 - $0.60 | $150 - $300 | High litigation |
| Massachusetts | $0.25 - $0.55 | $125 - $275 | Regulated rates |
| New Jersey | $0.35 - $0.65 | $175 - $325 | High benefit levels |
| New York | $0.35 - $0.70 | $175 - $350 | DBL adds costs |
| California | $0.40 - $0.75 | $200 - $375 | Highest regulation |
*Based on $50,000 annual salary
Construction Trades (High Risk)
| State | Rate per $100 Payroll | Annual Cost per Employee* | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | $4.00 - $8.00 | $2,000 - $4,000 | Lowest in analysis |
| Virginia | $4.50 - $10.00 | $2,250 - $5,000 | Moderate costs |
| Texas | $5.00 - $12.00 | $2,500 - $6,000 | Market competitive |
| Georgia | $5.00 - $10.00 | $2,500 - $5,000 | Growing market |
| Arizona | $4.00 - $10.00 | $2,000 - $5,000 | Construction boom |
| Ohio | $5.00 - $12.00 | $2,500 - $6,000 | BWC rates |
| Minnesota | $5.00 - $15.00 | $2,500 - $7,500 | Seasonal factors |
| Colorado | $4.00 - $15.00 | $2,000 - $7,500 | Altitude factors |
| Pennsylvania | $6.00 - $14.00 | $3,000 - $7,000 | Moderate-high |
| Michigan | $5.00 - $12.00 | $2,500 - $6,000 | Manufacturing state |
| Florida | $5.00 - $12.00 | $2,500 - $6,000 | Hurricane rebuilding |
| Washington | $1.50 - $5.00 | $750 - $2,500 | L&I lower rates |
| Illinois | $8.00 - $18.00 | $4,000 - $9,000 | High litigation |
| Massachusetts | $8.00 - $16.00 | $4,000 - $8,000 | Regulated market |
| New Jersey | $8.00 - $18.00 | $4,000 - $9,000 | High benefits |
| New York | $10.00 - $25.00 | $5,000 - $12,500 | Scaffold Law impact |
| California | $12.00 - $30.00 | $6,000 - $15,000 | Highest costs |
*Based on $50,000 annual salary
Monopolistic vs. Competitive Markets
Four states in our analysis have unique workers’ comp systems:
| State | System Type | Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Ohio | Monopolistic (BWC) | Must use state fund; group rating available |
| Washington | Monopolistic (L&I) | Must use state fund; self-insurance option |
| Texas | Optional | Can opt out entirely (with consequences) |
| All Others | Competitive | Private insurers compete for business |
Regional Cost Analysis
Northeast Region
States: New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts
Characteristics:
- Highest overall insurance costs
- Strong employee protections
- High litigation environment
- Dense urban markets
| Cost Factor | Impact | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Workers’ Comp | Highest | Benefit levels, litigation |
| Commercial Auto | High | Urban traffic, no-fault states |
| General Liability | High | Litigation frequency |
| Property | Moderate-High | Older buildings, weather |
Key Cost Drivers:
- New York’s Scaffold Law - Absolute liability for gravity-related injuries adds 5-10% to construction costs
- New Jersey’s benefit levels - Among highest in nation
- Massachusetts’ regulated rates - Less competition, stable but higher prices
- Pennsylvania’s choice no-fault - Adds complexity to auto coverage
Southeast Region
States: Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia
Characteristics:
- Generally lower costs
- Business-friendly regulations
- Hurricane exposure varies
- Right-to-work states
| Cost Factor | Impact | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Workers’ Comp | Low-Moderate | Competitive markets |
| Commercial Auto | Moderate | Traffic growth |
| General Liability | Low-Moderate | Lower litigation |
| Property | Variable | Hurricane exposure |
Key Cost Drivers:
- Florida’s hurricane exposure - Property insurance highly variable by location
- North Carolina’s Rate Bureau - Standardized rates reduce shopping benefit
- Georgia’s growth - Increasing construction demand affecting capacity
- Virginia’s government contracts - Specific requirements increase complexity
Midwest Region
States: Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, Minnesota
Characteristics:
- Mixed cost environment
- Manufacturing focus
- Seasonal weather impacts
- Varying regulatory approaches
| Cost Factor | Impact | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Workers’ Comp | Variable | Ohio low, Illinois high |
| Commercial Auto | Moderate | No-fault in MI/MN |
| General Liability | Moderate | Less litigation than coasts |
| Property | Moderate | Severe weather |
Key Cost Drivers:
- Illinois’ litigation environment - Plaintiff-friendly courts increase costs
- Ohio’s BWC monopoly - Less flexibility but group rating saves money
- Michigan’s no-fault reform - 2020 changes creating new dynamics
- Minnesota’s ESST - New compliance costs for all employers
West Region
States: California, Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Washington
Characteristics:
- Widest cost variation in any region
- California highest, Texas among lowest
- Rapid growth markets
- Unique state programs
| Cost Factor | Impact | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Workers’ Comp | Highly Variable | CA highest, TX optional |
| Commercial Auto | Variable | Urban vs. rural |
| General Liability | Variable | CA litigation highest |
| Property | Variable | Wildfire, earthquake |
Key Cost Drivers:
- California’s regulatory environment - Most expensive state overall
- Texas’ optional workers’ comp - Unique flexibility, different risks
- Arizona’s growth - Capacity tightening in construction
- Colorado’s wildfire exposure - Property markets hardening
- Washington’s L&I system - Lower WC costs, but mandatory PFML adds expense
Industry-Specific Cost Comparisons
Technology/Software Companies
| State | WC Cost | Cyber/E&O Availability | Overall Tech Insurance Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | Very Low | Excellent | ★★★★★ |
| Virginia | Very Low | Excellent | ★★★★★ |
| Arizona | Low | Good | ★★★★☆ |
| Colorado | Low | Good | ★★★★☆ |
| Georgia | Low | Good | ★★★★☆ |
| North Carolina | Low | Good | ★★★★☆ |
| Washington | Low | Excellent | ★★★★☆ |
| Minnesota | Moderate | Excellent | ★★★☆☆ |
| Ohio | Moderate | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Michigan | Moderate | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Pennsylvania | Moderate | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Florida | Moderate | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Illinois | High | Excellent | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Massachusetts | High | Excellent | ★★☆☆☆ |
| New Jersey | High | Good | ★★☆☆☆ |
| New York | Very High | Excellent | ★★☆☆☆ |
| California | Highest | Excellent | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Construction/Contracting
| State | WC Cost | Bonding Availability | Overall Construction Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | Lowest | Good | ★★★★★ |
| Virginia | Very Low | Good | ★★★★★ |
| Texas | Low | Excellent | ★★★★☆ |
| Georgia | Low | Good | ★★★★☆ |
| Arizona | Low-Moderate | Good | ★★★★☆ |
| Ohio | Moderate | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Colorado | Variable | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Florida | Moderate | Challenging | ★★★☆☆ |
| Minnesota | Moderate-High | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Pennsylvania | Moderate-High | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Michigan | Moderate | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Washington | Moderate | Good | ★★★☆☆ |
| Massachusetts | High | Good | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Illinois | High | Good | ★★☆☆☆ |
| New Jersey | Very High | Good | ★★☆☆☆ |
| New York | Highest | Good | ★☆☆☆☆ |
| California | Highest | Good | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Healthcare/Medical
| State | WC Cost | Malpractice Environment | Overall Healthcare Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | Low | Reformed (caps) | ★★★★★ |
| Virginia | Low | Moderate | ★★★★☆ |
| North Carolina | Low | Moderate | ★★★★☆ |
| Georgia | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★★☆ |
| Arizona | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Ohio | Moderate | Reformed | ★★★☆☆ |
| Colorado | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Minnesota | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Michigan | Moderate | Challenging | ★★★☆☆ |
| Washington | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Pennsylvania | High | Challenging | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Florida | High | Challenging | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Massachusetts | High | Moderate | ★★☆☆☆ |
| New Jersey | High | Challenging | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Illinois | Very High | Challenging | ★★☆☆☆ |
| New York | Very High | Challenging | ★☆☆☆☆ |
| California | Highest | Very Challenging | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Manufacturing
| State | WC Cost | Product Liability Environment | Overall Manufacturing Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | Low | Moderate | ★★★★★ |
| North Carolina | Low | Moderate | ★★★★★ |
| Virginia | Low | Moderate | ★★★★☆ |
| Georgia | Low-Moderate | Moderate | ★★★★☆ |
| Arizona | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★★☆ |
| Ohio | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Michigan | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Minnesota | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Colorado | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Washington | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Pennsylvania | Moderate-High | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Florida | Moderate | Moderate | ★★★☆☆ |
| Massachusetts | High | Moderate | ★★☆☆☆ |
| New Jersey | High | Challenging | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Illinois | High | Challenging | ★★☆☆☆ |
| New York | Very High | Challenging | ★★☆☆☆ |
| California | Highest | Very Challenging | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Key Cost Drivers by Factor
1. Benefit Levels
States with higher workers’ comp benefits have higher costs:
| Benefit Factor | High-Cost States | Low-Cost States |
|---|---|---|
| Wage Replacement % | NY, NJ, CA (66-70%) | GA, NC, VA (60-66%) |
| Maximum Weekly Benefit | CA, NJ, WA (>$1,500) | FL, GA, NC (<$1,000) |
| Medical Fee Schedules | NY, CA (higher) | TX, FL (controlled) |
| Permanent Disability | CA, NY (generous) | GA, NC (limited) |
2. Litigation Environment
Plaintiff-friendly states have higher overall costs:
| Litigation Factor | Impact | Affected States |
|---|---|---|
| Scaffold Law | +5-10% construction | New York only |
| Joint & Several Liability | Higher GL costs | CA, IL, NY, NJ |
| Tort Reform | Lower costs | TX, GA, NC |
| Medical Malpractice Caps | Lower healthcare costs | TX, VA |
3. Regulatory Structure
| Structure Type | Cost Impact | States |
|---|---|---|
| Monopolistic WC | Mixed | OH, WA |
| Highly Regulated | Higher | CA, NY, NJ |
| Competitive/Deregulated | Lower | TX, GA, AZ |
| Rate Bureau | Moderate | NC |
4. Geographic/Climate Factors
| Factor | Cost Impact | Affected States |
|---|---|---|
| Hurricane Exposure | Property +20-100% | FL, NC, VA (coastal) |
| Earthquake Risk | Property +10-50% | CA, WA |
| Wildfire | Property +20-50% | CA, CO, AZ |
| Severe Hail | Property +10-30% | CO, MN, TX |
| Harsh Winters | Auto/Property +5-15% | MN, MI, MA |
5. Mandatory Programs Adding Cost
| Program | Annual Cost Impact | States |
|---|---|---|
| Paid Family Leave | $200-800/employee | NY, NJ, MA, WA, CO |
| Disability Insurance | $100-400/employee | NY, NJ, CA |
| Long-Term Care | $200-400/employee | WA |
| Sick Leave Mandates | $100-300/employee | Many states |
Total Cost of Employment-Related Insurance
Comparison for 10-Employee Office Business
Annual insurance costs including workers’ comp, EPLI, and mandatory programs:
| State | WC | Mandatory Programs | Total | vs. Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | $3,750 | $6,000 | $9,750 | +62% |
| New York | $3,500 | $5,500 | $9,000 | +50% |
| New Jersey | $3,250 | $4,500 | $7,750 | +29% |
| Washington | $1,000 | $5,000 | $6,000 | 0% |
| Massachusetts | $2,750 | $3,000 | $5,750 | -4% |
| Colorado | $2,000 | $3,500 | $5,500 | -8% |
| Illinois | $3,000 | $2,000 | $5,000 | -17% |
| Minnesota | $2,250 | $2,000 | $4,250 | -29% |
| Pennsylvania | $2,750 | $1,000 | $3,750 | -38% |
| Florida | $2,500 | $1,000 | $3,500 | -42% |
| Michigan | $2,500 | $1,000 | $3,500 | -42% |
| Ohio | $2,500 | $1,000 | $3,500 | -42% |
| Arizona | $2,000 | $1,000 | $3,000 | -50% |
| Virginia | $2,250 | $500 | $2,750 | -54% |
| Georgia | $2,000 | $500 | $2,500 | -58% |
| Texas | $2,000 | $500 | $2,500 | -58% |
| North Carolina | $1,500 | $500 | $2,000 | -67% |
Cost Optimization Strategies by State Type
High-Cost States (CA, NY, NJ, IL, MA)
- Aggressive safety programs - ROI highest in expensive states
- Experience modification focus - Every point matters more
- Alternative risk financing - Captives, large deductibles
- Claim management - Active involvement reduces costs
- Return-to-work programs - Minimize lost time
- Classification review - Ensure proper coding
Moderate-Cost States (FL, WA, MI, PA, CO, MN)
- Shop the market regularly - Competitive markets reward shopping
- Bundle policies - Multi-line discounts significant
- Loss control investment - Prevent claims before they happen
- Deductible optimization - Balance retention vs. premium
- Industry association programs - Group buying power
Low-Cost States (TX, VA, GA, NC, AZ, OH)
- Maintain coverage adequacy - Don’t underinsure due to low costs
- Focus on growth planning - Ensure coverage scales
- Build safety culture - Keep advantage with good experience
- Invest savings elsewhere - Use cost advantage strategically
- Watch for market changes - Low-cost markets can harden
Five-Year Cost Trend Analysis
States with Rising Costs
| State | 5-Year Trend | Primary Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Florida | +25% | Hurricane losses, litigation |
| Colorado | +20% | Wildfire, growth |
| California | +18% | Regulation, wildfire |
| Arizona | +15% | Growth, heat claims |
| New York | +12% | Benefit increases |
States with Stable/Declining Costs
| State | 5-Year Trend | Primary Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | -5% | Market competition |
| Ohio | -8% | BWC reforms |
| Michigan | -10% | No-fault reform |
| North Carolina | Stable | Rate Bureau stability |
| Virginia | Stable | Competitive market |
Key Takeaways
For Multi-State Businesses
- Insurance costs should factor into location decisions - Differences can exceed $10,000 per employee annually
- Compliance complexity varies - Some states require more administrative overhead
- Risk profile matters - High-risk industries see greater state-to-state variation
- Markets change - Today’s low-cost state may not stay that way
For Single-State Businesses
- Benchmark against your state - Know if you’re above or below average
- Focus on controllable factors - Safety, claims management, shopping
- Understand your state’s rules - Compliance requirements vary significantly
- Watch for regulatory changes - New programs can significantly impact costs
Cost Ranking Summary
Lowest Cost (Best for business): North Carolina, Virginia, Texas, Georgia
Moderate Cost: Arizona, Ohio, Minnesota, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania
High Cost: Washington, Massachusetts, Illinois, New Jersey
Highest Cost: New York, California
This analysis provides general guidance based on typical business profiles. Actual costs vary significantly based on industry, claims history, company size, and specific risk factors. Consult with insurance professionals for quotes specific to your situation.
Comments